From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org  Fri Oct 30 08:24:15 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4199A2074E
 for <freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 08:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A2C1508
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 08:24:15 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from desk.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102])
 by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9EA32A47;
 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 08:24:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by desk.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id 95CF8A660; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:24:03 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Guillaume Bibaut <freebsd-security@iaelu.net>
Cc: "Herbert J. Skuhra" <herbert@oslo.ath.cx>,  freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Compilation problem since SA-15:25 for FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE
References: <4D69BAFF-7447-4A1F-ABB8-686CA34090F3@iaelu.net>
 <20151027114642.GA7848@oslo.ath.cx>
 <4043BA45-F5A5-4218-93F2-C320DE65EB6D@iaelu.net>
 <20151027125913.GB7848@oslo.ath.cx>
 <20151027150144.GD7848@oslo.ath.cx>
 <AA734831-0FE8-4E8B-BEED-64B9D020C201@iaelu.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:24:03 +0100
In-Reply-To: <AA734831-0FE8-4E8B-BEED-64B9D020C201@iaelu.net> (Guillaume
 Bibaut's message of "Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:21:16 +0100")
Message-ID: <86wpu4bw7w.fsf@desk.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
 <freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 08:24:15 -0000

Guillaume Bibaut <freebsd-security@iaelu.net> writes:
> Herbert J. Skuhra <herbert@oslo.ath.cx> writes:
> > OK, with 'patch -p0 < /path/to/ntp-102.patch' I get only [...]
> As far as I know, the SA does not mention 'patch -p0'. Shouldn=E2=80=99t =
this
> be mentioned?

BSD patch(1) assumes -p0.  GNU patch(1) does not.  I assume Herbert is
used to GNU patch(1) and used -p0 out of habit.  It is harmless, but not
necessary.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no