From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 13:04:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E79116A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:04:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from miha.netstream-gh.com (miha.netstream-gh.com [193.220.176.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9943443D2D for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:04:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from miha@ghuug.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by miha.netstream-gh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2D672F9; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:08:10 +0000 (GMT) From: "Mikhail P." To: Eric Anderson , miha@ghuug.org Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:08:10 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20031210203626.C29598-100000@frankenstein.pimpjesus.com> <200312102051.54067.miha@ghuug.org> <3FD789A8.60507@centtech.com> In-Reply-To: <3FD789A8.60507@centtech.com> Organization: Ghana Unix Users Group MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312102108.10351.miha@ghuug.org> cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: Omar Refai Subject: Re: webmail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: miha@ghuug.org List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:04:56 -0000 actually my post meant to be "we used squirrelmail some time ago [..]" my apologizes for confusion. and yes, you are right, neomail (right to the point webmail) was the father regards, M. On Wednesday 10 December 2003 21:01, Eric Anderson wrote: > Mikhail P. wrote: > >We are using Openwebmail (http://openwebmail.org) and users are quite > > happy with it (used to be squirrelmail some time ago, but OpenWebmail > > seems to be more "popular" among users). It is very flexible and has lots > > of > >plugins/addons. > > Actually, openwebmail was Neomail, not Squirrelmail.. Squirrelmail is > what we use, and it is great, although openwebmail is very nice also. > > >On Wednesday 10 December 2003 20:38, Omar Refai wrote: > >>Howdy all. This is my first post. I was wondering if anyone out there is > >>having much success using a webmail server in production? Tried out horde > >>but it is incredibly slow. I have heard that squirrel mail with dovecot > >>or courier for an IMAP server is pretty good but haven't heard from > >> anyone using it at a production level. > > Eric