From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar  6 21:58:08 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5328416A420
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon,  6 Mar 2006 21:58:08 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it)
Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766E143D6E
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon,  6 Mar 2006 21:58:07 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it)
Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-53-236.51-151.net24.it [151.51.236.53])
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by parrot.aev.net (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k26MAUr6058771
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 23:10:37 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it)
Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18])
	by soth.ventu (8.13.5/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k26LvmmR043178;
	Mon, 6 Mar 2006 22:57:48 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it)
Message-ID: <440CB05E.6000805@netfence.it>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:57:50 +0100
From: Andrea Venturoli <ml.diespammer@netfence.it>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060130)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vince Hoffman <jhary@unsane.co.uk>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
References: <440C961A.1060107@netfence.it> <20060306211542.U87940@unsane.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20060306211542.U87940@unsane.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 212.31.247.179
Cc: 
Subject: Re: vr0: rx packet lost
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:58:08 -0000

Vince Hoffman wrote:
> 
> This may sound silly but if performance is that bad have you checked if 
> you have a Duplex mismatch ? (one side set to full manually and the 
> other to auto commonly results in duplex mismatches in my experience. 
> (see http://www.cites.uiuc.edu/network/autosense.html or use google for 
> more info)

Hm, my switch isn't manageable, so it can't be set manually to 
full-duplex and must be using autosense.
As for the card:

 > ifconfig vr0
> vr0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>         inet 10.1.2.125 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 10.255.255.255
>         inet6 fe80::213:d4ff:fecc:a6a2%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
>         ether 00:13:d4:cc:a6:a2
>         media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
>         status: active

This was configured through rc.conf with:

 > ifconfig_vr0="DHCP"


So I guess this is not the problem.

  bye & Thanks anyway
	av.