From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 14 07:00:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78ED81065670; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 07:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (backbone.deglitch.com [IPv6:2001:16d8:fffb:4::abba]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ABA48FC1B; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 07:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (unknown [77.232.3.143]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 545F68FC27; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:00:18 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A056239C4E; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:01:30 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:01:30 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov To: rick-freebsd2008@kiwi-computer.com Message-Id: <20090614110130.a75bf5d2.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090614062157.GA67705@keira.kiwi-computer.com> References: <1242609781.00113421.1242598202@10.7.7.3> <4A122B72.80206@FreeBSD.org> <20090519184150.GA990@keira.kiwi-computer.com> <20090605020054.GA67365@keira.kiwi-computer.com> <4A28D79C.6070406@FreeBSD.org> <20090614050211.GA67556@keira.kiwi-computer.com> <20090614062157.GA67705@keira.kiwi-computer.com> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon X-PGP-Fingerprint: B83A B15D 929A 364A D8BC B3F9 BF25 A231 092F D9F0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Sun__14_Jun_2009_11_01_30_+0400_tqe=Y.e6BPlZEV.s" Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org, Alexander Motin Subject: Re: snd_hda works on i386, fails on amd64 (RELENG_7) X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 07:00:19 -0000 --Signature=_Sun__14_Jun_2009_11_01_30_+0400_tqe=Y.e6BPlZEV.s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:21:57 -0500 "Rick C. Petty" mentioned: > Out of curiosity, how come this same test (for support_64bit) isn't needed > before the bus_dma_tag_create() in hdac_attach? >=20 The hdac_attach doesn't directly allocate any DMA memory at all, instead it calls hdac_dma_alloc to perform this task. The support_64bit variable gets setted up in hdac_get_capabilities just before calling DMA allocation funct= ions that needs it. --=20 Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE --Signature=_Sun__14_Jun_2009_11_01_30_+0400_tqe=Y.e6BPlZEV.s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJKNKBKAAoJEKN82nOYvCd0twAP/jacMlEA1SAyi1yTu2hkhQ2b FHroviMX0QzRZbAmUvgHWP+5VUtGEE/roPPNYQFkUQdv79p9njlWDip3vq7DYbh4 9hExIW4RIQqY7lvyiJucTi+ckUpBqbh/DuafN4qrUueFjzCC/1kUmScdiVlljTDH ao7TiUGDgZwfU44IdmPCguV5yh1WkFM5YcGGvStYTJUo/YQMfZE+AbvCQ8OXXtFT QDrhoz76NYxH+9hz7UrKgboLBws83bweJjXUl0RXbKidvled8zg7dmWpODC0FWYH hMa8hKK2w8IsW9VdDKYUIjyr+I5lRpJCKWT+2LjKLwGwaXrjE8nX5Yeox2Otd+Za X5KYSICTWswuzlzU7AXFBtYSwgB4MEGaiJjuzknPeUO7eX+XsTC4fSvx60e452bT 6AvliNBdJMXSAogjjr9aWUS+ZX87DKzpa9qn/Efrcfw+8IixOfR9E8WcT4pe3ctK kY4FgJl3hqmUZa99HAlhDNTHOt6clHNSy1NzpKSfWuUFirNWSAZz9n6BbyFMCiSr zsTMIvofzmJXOo13Dy96M5Y5mlRIF9s1nSr4EI7dtllThXqDZ1SmOR2DyPKQD+y2 DemPsprPP375ctBJiN0HO3XO4DxTsaIOYE6HRqi9sLnHflZ1AhjJSzABkS+ILDPN XqETmRc+5FfnNtC7VtEJ =jyVd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__14_Jun_2009_11_01_30_+0400_tqe=Y.e6BPlZEV.s--