From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Mar 22 09:13:46 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA09853 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 22 Mar 1995 09:13:46 -0800
Received: from LOCALHOST (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id JAA09846; Wed, 22 Mar 1995 09:13:45 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host LOCALHOST didn't use HELO protocol
To: Joshua Peck Macdonald <jmacd@freefall.cdrom.com>
Cc: ports@freefall.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: tgdb 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 22 Mar 95 08:44:39 PST."
             <8719.795890679@freefall.cdrom.com> 
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 1995 09:13:44 -0800
Message-ID: <9844.795892424@freefall.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com>
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I should read more - as clearly indicated later, we need to fix BLT.
Disregard this:

> > whether this is a tgdb bug or a freebsd-port bug I am not sure, but
> > I was just trying out the help file that comes with tgdb, by clicking
> > on help, selecting TGDB, then on the first page of help I clicked on 
> > the top-left button, TOC, and get a segmentation fault, saying there
> 
> Boy, you scored a bullseye there!
> 
> Yeah, there's some sort of problem.  It looks like there's a genuine
> error in the tgdb distribution's tcl stuff someplace and tgdb_wish's
> ability to show the backtrace is itself broken somehow, so we segv.
> Sounds like we need a fix for both!  Time for a port version so we can
> debug this, folks!  Hey!  Why are you all running away? :-)
> 
> 						Jordan