From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 19 22:11:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCE116A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 22:11:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail6.speakeasy.net (mail6.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E8343D55 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 22:11:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 21226 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2004 22:11:27 -0000 Received: from dsl027-160-063.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) encrypted SMTP for ; 19 Nov 2004 22:11:26 -0000 Received: from [10.50.41.235] (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAJMBJbr008149; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:11:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: "Wilkinson, Alex" Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:57:42 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20041116021421.GK56252@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au> <20041118053724.GS66822@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au> In-Reply-To: <20041118053724.GS66822@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200411191657.42735.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on server.baldwin.cx cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bge(4) watchdog timeout X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 22:11:28 -0000 On Thursday 18 November 2004 12:37 am, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: > Well, if I do that I will be using the old AT-PIC. > Which as far as I am aware is old and crusty ;-\ > > Is this correct john ? It will still work ok. The only major downside is that PCI devices will probably have to share IRQ lines whereas they usually don't with APICs. > -aW > > 0n Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 06:56:13PM +0100, Arno J. Klaassen wrote: > > "Wilkinson, Alex" writes: > > I get the following errors, however, although it states that there is no > > carrier, there is. > > > > bge0: firmware handshake timed out > > bge0: RX CPU self-diagnostics failed! > > bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > options=1a > > inet 131.185.40.211 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 131.185.43.255 > > ether 00:11:0a:40:d2:dd > > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > > status: no carrier > > > > Mounting NFS file systems:bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting > > > > > > Here is ifconfig(8) output after fully booted: > > > > bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > options=1a > > inet 131.185.40.211 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 131.185.43.255 > > ether 00:11:0a:40:d2:dd > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > status: active > > > > Seems odd enough, to email the wizards about it. > > one of my co-workers had a similar problem (PR 73538). > Leaving out "device apic" from the kernel-config "fixed" the > problem. YMMV > > Arno -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org