From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Jul 24 14:54:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA26568 for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 24 Jul 1997 14:54:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.nacamar.de (mail.nacamar.de [194.162.162.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA26562 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 1997 14:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.52.251.6] (apfel.nacamar.de [195.52.251.6]) by mail.nacamar.de (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id XAA13114; Thu, 24 Jul 1997 23:54:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Sender: petzi@mail.nacamar.de Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <33D76A6B.B7339D87@persprog.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 23:54:25 +0200 To: Chuck Robey , Dave Alderman From: Michael Beckmann Subject: Re: SMC Etherpower II issues Cc: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 15:54 Uhr -0400 24.07.1997, Chuck Robey wrote: >On Thu, 24 Jul 1997, Dave Alderman wrote: > >> Michael Beckmann wrote: >> > >> > I was told, but have not been able to verify, that new PCI Ethernet cards >> > from SMC "SMC EtherPower II 10/100" >> > are no longer equipped with "Digital 21140" chips, but rather with >> > EPIC/100 83c170 chips. >> > >> > This has some implications on the usability with FreeBSD, I guess. >> > >> The last ad I saw for the card showed an SMC part on the board. It was >> definitely not a 21140 (unless they cloned it). > >I bought one 5 days ago and it still had the DEC chip in it. I guess this was an SMC EtherPower, and not an SMC EtherPower II ? Michael