From owner-freebsd-sparc Sat Apr 14 14:28:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Received: from snark.ptc.spbu.ru (snark.ptc.spbu.ru [195.19.225.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8EB37B50F for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 14:28:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uwe@snark.ptc.spbu.ru) Received: (from uwe@localhost) by snark.ptc.spbu.ru (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id BAA08405 for freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 01:28:52 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 01:28:52 +0400 From: "Valeriy E. Ushakov" To: freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: just some questions on the port status Message-ID: <20010415012852.B8136@snark.ptc.spbu.ru> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG References: <3AD8605A.4E04601D@gizmo.quizbot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.3i In-Reply-To: <3AD8605A.4E04601D@gizmo.quizbot.org>; from "Robert Drehmel" on Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 16:36:10 Sender: owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 16:36:10 +0200, Robert Drehmel wrote: > 4) The port will be split up into sparc[v8] and sparc[v9|64], right? For sparc32 I'd stick with NetBSD, there's no need to duplicate the effort. As much as I love sparc32, it's getting, umm... let's say "not mainstream", and the effort to port FreeBSD to it doesn't worth it, especially since there's a quality NetBSD port. SY, Uwe -- uwe@ptc.spbu.ru | Zu Grunde kommen http://www.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message