From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 26 12:10:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F61D106566C for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F278FC08 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6QCAD03027378 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:10:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q6QCADAk027377; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:10:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:10:13 GMT Message-Id: <201207261210.q6QCADAk027377@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Michael Scheidell Cc: Subject: Re: ports/169855: [NEW PORT] net-mgmt/p0f2: Passive OS fingerprinting tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Scheidell List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:10:13 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/169855; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Michael Scheidell To: , Cc: Subject: Re: ports/169855: [NEW PORT] net-mgmt/p0f2: Passive OS fingerprinting tool Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:00:50 -0400 --------------070603020505080102030709 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thank you for your ports submission and continued support of FreeBSD (and on a personal note, I stopped using p0f 3.x due to its small database) Several issues here: #1, we can't put in a new port without a maintainer. #2, this really needs to be a 'repocopy net-mgmt/p0f -> net-mgmt/p0f2', not a 'new port' #3, the pr submission should be the diffs to take 'net-mgmt/p0f2' forward (including your name as maintainer) #4, don't bump portrevision, this is a new port, portrevision like should be removed make those changes, and someone will test and commit. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell --------------070603020505080102030709 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thank you for your ports submission and continued support of FreeBSD (and on a personal note, I stopped using p0f 3.x due to its small database)

Several issues here:
#1, we can't put in a new port without a maintainer.
#2, this really needs to be a 'repocopy net-mgmt/p0f -> net-mgmt/p0f2', not a 'new port'
#3, the pr submission should be the diffs to take 'net-mgmt/p0f2' forward (including your name as maintainer)
#4, don't bump portrevision, this is a new port, portrevision like should be removed

make those changes, and someone will test and commit.

--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
> | SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
--------------070603020505080102030709--