From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 16 11:17:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D941065671 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 11:17:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCDB8FC13 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 11:17:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4GBHVXu019370; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:17:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m4GBHV5r019367; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:17:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:17:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Manolis Kiagias In-Reply-To: <482D6937.10906@otenet.gr> Message-ID: <20080516131443.W19365@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <482D54B3.3060306@otenet.gr> <200805161314.22978.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <20080516125422.Q19201@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <482D6937.10906@otenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Nikos Vassiliadis Subject: Re: Routing to internet addresses ending with 255 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:17:41 -0000 >> i don't think it's freebsd version dependent, unless developers made a bug. >> >> > all these systems are behind ADSL routers and use NAT. Their internal > addresses are in the 192.168.0.X range. > I could easily consider this a problem of the (cheap) ADSL routers, but 6 very likely. yesterday i configured chinese 5 WLAN/LAN switch/routers, it looks like it's software was written by someone during single lunch break ;) i found 2 bugs not even searching much. but - as just a LAN/WLAN bridges they work fine. > and 7 use the same model (OTOH, there may be different firmware versions). but WHAT are external IP's of these routers. this is important. if the "problem" host is A.B.C.255 check if routers external IP isn't A.B.C.something