From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org Mon Nov 16 14:06:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01205A307A5 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:06:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C22AE1F79 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:06:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3049820926 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:06:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:06:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=g6Mdd5hAdJ63FXdWC2Y/geHw0Jw=; b=VLw/xa V6oGZnqz4Zh1T6+tvi1IdLfiNSloVcIsSfvqK0WeYPzDjPo423vfNcNH3WraqO1p dvaG8njAjA9Aw86VsXb7DlZ8K3eARDxqdoc3UnPHeag5gIN48PT5lOweUY8vULIr PEgm/eWPiGfG7PET3DX4V42ZI0klFllD8WPZg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=g6Mdd5hAdJ63FXd WC2Y/geHw0Jw=; b=CqhuQ/iaJd6uirAc6WkyssrylRjqDuEbkG0yX8H8yE9dlDe lnPvsUU430SsRILz/uI5sh1+6A18mGfpZDWG5Xke9I3DIxuURkU/do88DJcWuE7m TqzFxfnfVGfPmuxTd6p8d5icRtUMot9yf9PmjAljqAp3ak7el8Y2KUXA+jD4= Received: by web3.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 030DF10448C; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:06:39 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1447682799.243430.441054785.7914EFBA@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: FXLvMJK0mtmY01uZBbRoP56bYeu/iz2yK4TPeUvIRvV8 1447682799 From: Mark Felder To: Robert Simmons , freebsd-security@freebsd.org Cc: ports-secteam@freebsd.org, "Jung-uk Kim" , java@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-37ba1837 Subject: Re: java/openjdk8 and jre Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:06:39 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <1447601433.2163074.440262121.5DEBCEDD@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:27:13 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:06:45 -0000 On Sun, Nov 15, 2015, at 23:00, Robert Simmons wrote: > I don't see a problem with that. u65 is the security fix version and u66 > is > a bugfix that includes u65. The openjdk project appears to have skipped > straight to u66 since both were released simultaneously. > > From Oracle's website: "Java SE 8u65 includes important security fixes. > Oracle strongly recommends that all Java SE 8 users upgrade to this > release. Java SE 8u66 is a patch-set update, including all of 8u65 plus > additional features (described in the release notes)." > > The openjdk website lists u66 as released. > Where did you see u66 on the OpenJDK site? I tried to browse the site and find the latest release and it was a futile attempt. Their website is terrible. (openjdk.java.net) CC'ing jkim@ as he has more Java port knowledge than I do... I don't foresee myself updating the port, but I can get a vuxml entry added. -- Mark Felder feld@feld.me