From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 08:15:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0133106566B for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 08:15:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625678FC0C for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 08:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Qz2RH-000D0n-IK; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:15:55 +0200 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:15:55 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110901081555.GN28186@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Ivan Alexandrovich Subject: ng_vlan since 8.x, was: Re: ethernet Q-in-Q ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 08:15:55 -0000 Hi! Ivan wrote: > With ng_vlan nesting is also possible, but since 8.0 > I had to comment out this node name check in ng_ether.c: > > if ((node = ng_name2noderef(NULL, ifp->if_xname)) != NULL) { > NG_NODE_UNREF(node); > return; About the ng_vlan approach -- 4 years ago you described the setup with ng_vlan (thank you, I'll test it soon): http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2007-August/015163.html This patch of yours -- is there an PR for it ? Why was is not included ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 9 years to go !