From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Aug 11 17:12:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dt011n65.san.rr.com (dt011n65.san.rr.com [204.210.13.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D3D15674 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 17:12:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt011n65.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA72434; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 17:11:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <37B21136.4E1D568@gorean.org> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 17:11:34 -0700 From: Doug Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT-0730 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: allanr@ssimicro.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, Gary Kline , Dutch Collins , Mitch Collinsworth , Thomas Good Subject: Re: Question about the mascot References: <002801bee42e$4d5b2500$0201a8c0@allan.alerius.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Allan Ross wrote: > > I have been following this thread rather closely, out of a morbid sense > of curiosity more than anything. I wasn't planning on commenting, but > the more I thought about the issue, the more it bothered me. In a > nutshell, one camp has asked for advertising material without the demon > and then gone on to argue that the whole use of the demon as a mascot > should be stopped. You are, quite simply, wrong. No one has said that. If you think you read someone saying that, check again. What I have said, about 8 times now is that the "little devil" makes some people uncomfortable and that promotional materials without it would be a good thing. That's all, period. This argument is silly enough without misrepresenting what's been said. Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message