From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 29 14:49:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67C616A41F; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:49:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h-k@mail.ru) Received: from mx6.mail.ru (mx6.mail.ru [194.67.23.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524E543D45; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:49:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h-k@mail.ru) Received: from [217.117.113.177] (port=53870 helo=217.117.113.177) by mx6.mail.ru with esmtp id 1EVs1O-000Ohl-00; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:49:26 +0400 Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:49:45 +0400 From: dawnshade X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62 Christmas Edition) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1886562656.20051029184945@mail.ru> To: Jung-uk Kim In-Reply-To: <200510281103.38622.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <200510281103.38622.jkim@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:09:22 +0000 Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re[4]: [PATCH] ACPICA 20051021 import X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dawnshade List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:49:28 -0000 Hello Jung-uk, Friday, October 28, 2005, 7:03:34 PM, you wrote: JuK> On Friday 28 October 2005 02:19 am, dawnshade wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jung-uk Kim >> To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org >> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 19:34:16 -0400 >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPICA 20051021 import >> >> > As I promised earlier, here is the patch against RELENG_6: >> > >> > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/acpica-import-20051021-stable.dif >> >f.gz JuK> Soryy, that was my local file. Corrected. btw, new file not gzipped, just diff. JuK> This means that you have applied the patch twice or more. You will JuK> have to clean up your tree and re-apply the patch. FYI, these files JuK> have to be removed before apply the patch again: JuK> src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/acnames.h JuK> src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/acopcode.h JuK> src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/aecommon.h JuK> src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/aeexec.c JuK> src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/psloop.c JuK> src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/rsinfo.c JuK> src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/utcache.c JuK> src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/utmutex.c JuK> src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/utstate.c JuK> src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/compiler/asldefine.h Thank you, i didn't metioned that patch create new files. After removing (and dl new patch) all compiled and install fine. dmesg nothing differ from previous boot, all devices present exept not working before it (like est, acpi_perf0 and psm). At first look all work fine, system boots, X11 started and power indicator works (i tested on laptop) plugged and unplugged. Can you tell me what i need more test? (unfortunatly i usually perform antiviral and antispam solutions tests :) btw, my system is Acer TM 4151LMi (Pentium M 730 1.6GHz, i915, ICH6+SATA150) unfortunalty i can test kernel only w/o 'device apic', because with this dev i give many IDE timeouts and as result system freeze. P.S. Sorry for poor english and email client. ---------- Best regards, dawnshade mailto:h-k@mail.ru