From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 9 13:13:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from search.sparks.net (search.sparks.net [208.5.188.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13FB37C2C1 for ; Tue, 9 May 2000 13:08:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmiller@search.sparks.net) Received: by search.sparks.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 7127CDC01; Tue, 9 May 2000 16:03:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by search.sparks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B11DC00 for ; Tue, 9 May 2000 16:03:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 16:03:08 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Server Farms? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I love being able to track bug fixes and such via cvsup and -stable branches. But it's not really an appropriate process to sup and make buildworld on every server in a hundred server farm. Is there some way to roll binary only changes off one server tracking -stable? Secondly, is there any existing method for tracking significant changes, for some value of significant? My definition would be first security related patches and secondly stability related changes. It would be really nice to seperate them into those which require relinking/rebooting and those which don't. RTFM comments welcome if they have a pointer to TFM:) Thanks, --- David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message