From owner-freebsd-chat  Thu Oct  9 08:53:42 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA08184
          for chat-outgoing; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 08:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat)
Received: from shadows.aeon.net (shadows.aeon.net [194.100.41.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA07864
          for <chat@freebsd.org>; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 08:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from bsdcur@shadows.aeon.net)
Received: (from bsdcur@localhost)
          by shadows.aeon.net (8.8.7/8.8.3) id SAA13677
          for chat@freebsd.org; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 18:48:10 +0200 (EET)
From: mika ruohotie <bsdcur@shadows.aeon.net>
Message-Id: <199710091648.SAA13677@shadows.aeon.net>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc make.conf
In-Reply-To: <7705.876401147@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Oct 9, 97 05:45:47 am"
To: chat@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 18:48:10 +0200 (EET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

(from cvs to current to chat, i dont want to flood "usefull" lists 
with this)

> > thus "works", right?
> Right.  It's used by the standard FTP:
> Is documented by fetch:

yeah, i noticed (before i posted to the list), that's why i posted, i
thought it's broken, or something.

> > as far as i can see, this is far better way to do it than
> > bloating the fetch to actually agree with FTP_PASSIVE_MODE.
> Fetch is already, through libftpio, supposed to agree with
> it.  Unfortunately, I don't have a firewall'd machined handy
> to test at the moment but it's certainly worked in the past
> when I did.

uh, i _swear_ my machine at work, originally may 3.0 snap, brought
several times up-to-date -current with all /etc modifications
and stuff, needed that line to /etc/make.conf until it used that
passive mode. (last update to -current is from monday)

i can make it again inoperational by removing the line!

has the fact that our netbsd (wasnt/isnt my installation!) translates
my 10.0.0.0 into "real" internet address with ipnat something to
do with it?

hmm, ok, forget it. *sulk*

anyone want to fly to finland and take a peek? (hell, no, i'm not
paying the tickets, sorry)

=)

> 					Jordan


mickey