From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 17 22:50:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F1D8CD for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 22:50:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpet@sdf.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B1B78F for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 22:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (dsl-187-150-179-163-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx [187.150.179.163] (may be forged)) (authenticated (0 bits)) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2HMo78F027017; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 22:50:08 GMT Message-ID: <5146489E.7080906@sdf.org> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:50:06 -0600 From: Chris Petrik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Waitman Gobble Subject: Re: Gnustep group References: <1363559011.2076@da3m0n8t3r.com> In-Reply-To: <1363559011.2076@da3m0n8t3r.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: John Marino , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 22:50:12 -0000 On 03/17/2013 04:23 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > John Marino wrote .. >> On 3/17/2013 22:58, Chris Petrik wrote: >>>> Yes, after review I notice the GNUstep ports are totally not working.. >>>> it doesn't work with base clang. >>>> >>>> However, clang in ports works, and all the GNUstep modules build from >>>> svn without issue.. so it really should be a piece of cake to build >>>> some new GNUstep ports.. if there's interest. >>>> Here are my notes so far. >>>> >> FWIW - All the GNUstep ports build fine in DPorts (ports on DragonFly). >> However, the compiler uses is the base compiler, which is GCC 4.7 with >> ObjC built-in. >> >> That would imply setting USE_GCC=4.6+ would "fix" gnustep on ports, no? >> >> John >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Maybe it will work, I tried with gcc48. One of the gnustep ports is stuck on trying to build gcc4.2 for some reason.. I don't recall which one at the moment, i think it was base? > I would try the next minimum build which is 4.4 if that works then add in 4.4+ etc.. but i havent messed with it yet.