From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sun Mar 13 12:01:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC8AACDE46 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:01:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B908764 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:01:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2DC1giU078318 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:01:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206120] math/clblas: Update to 2.10 Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:01:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rakuco@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:01:43 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206120 --- Comment #7 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #6) > @Raphael, why was the maintainer-feedback flag (and needs-patch) removed = if > the current patch needs to be updated given it's failing? Isn't the maintainer-feedback flag used to indicate if the maintainer is responding to a patch send by someone? Since the maintainer is the submitte= r I thought it was redundant. As for needs-patch, to me it seemed to be used when a patch needed to be se= nt, so since there's a patch here (even if not ready) I removed it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=