From owner-freebsd-scsi  Fri Feb 20 23:42:08 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA11402
          for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Fri, 20 Feb 1998 23:42:08 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA11397
          for <scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 20 Feb 1998 23:42:06 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from root@implode.root.com)
Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA19276;
	Fri, 20 Feb 1998 23:40:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199802210740.XAA19276@implode.root.com>
To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com>
cc: Tom <tom@sdf.com>, scsi@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: very slow scsi performance 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 20 Feb 1998 23:58:01 MST."
             <199802210658.XAA28088@narnia.plutotech.com> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 23:40:38 -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

>>   But CAM means current.  Downgrading production servers to current is not
>> an option.
>
>CAM works for wcarchive and many of Satoshi's "production" systems.  It
>is possible to port CAM to 2.2 as well since that is how wcarchive is
>using it.

   I should mention that what I'm using on there has been quite stable as
well.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message