From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun  2 14:24:22 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7736037B401
	for <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>; Mon,  2 Jun 2003 14:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo.feral.com [192.67.166.79])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC5A43F85
	for <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>; Mon,  2 Jun 2003 14:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mjacob@feral.com)
Received: from mailhost.feral.com (mjacob@mailhost.feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by beppo.feral.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h52LOKqw072502;
	Mon, 2 Jun 2003 14:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mjacob@feral.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 14:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
X-X-Sender: mjacob@beppo
To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
In-Reply-To: <3EDB8671.23600.C9E174E6@localhost>
Message-ID: <20030602142401.H71034@beppo>
References: <577540000.1054579840@aslan.btc.adaptec.com>
	<3EDB8671.23600.C9E174E6@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
cc: Kern Sibbald <kern@sibbald.com>
Subject: Re: SCSI tape data loss
X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com
List-Id: SCSI subsystem <freebsd-scsi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 21:24:22 -0000


More data points are indeed always useful. Thanks for doing that!

On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Dan Langille wrote:

> On 2 Jun 2003 at 13:14, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> > Probably. Actually, it was 63k.
> >
> > But I sorta doubt that this was the issue.
>
> Well, I started it, and it's done now, so in case it's ever useful:
>
>  # ./tpt -v -b 65536 -r 10000000000 -n 10 -f /dev/nrsa0
> .......Rewind Tape
> ........Write Pass
> WEOT at File 0 Record 52374 Offset 0 (3432382464 total bytes written)
> Elapsed Seconds: 3264; Data Rate: 1.00276MB/s
> .......Rewind Tape
> .........Read Pass
> REOT at File 1 Record 0 Offset 0 (3432382464 total bytes read)
> Elapsed Seconds: 3256: Data Rate: 1.00522MB/s
> --
> Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
>
>