From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 29 14:17:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462B416A400 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:17:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from usleepless@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D7F43D67 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:17:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from usleepless@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f1so155890nzc for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:17:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rDusx8SaIyA4jF4ZFg2w8/Cw3CZEaVoPOuZrVkw/IMkw1Ca74AL/lDVIa8isVp2hGcvv71T2eoPiP1jN3O5Rdc+7g3Rn45QignVTHAtU3POH7mL6MoLsLqzhi4nztERiH/C9e0oVFZeEmRkvgdS70vlB1xbOIvUQCfIG8yJZjtQ= Received: by 10.36.13.15 with SMTP id 15mr1027434nzm; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:17:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.154.20 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:17:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:17:06 +0200 From: usleepless@gmail.com To: "Chris Maness" In-Reply-To: <442A92B7.3000706@chrismaness.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <442742AB.8070105@chrismaness.com> <4428D51E.7080608@chrismaness.com> <20060328095540.Q35270@ns1.internetinsite.com> <442A9060.8050107@chrismaness.com> <442A92B7.3000706@chrismaness.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DVD-Slideshow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:17:10 -0000 > I'm not doing this to benifit myself. I'm am trying to support the > project as a whole. Most of the things that you patched are already > addressed in _3. I don't understand why you would dry to work out bugs > in something that is not current. If we can fix the current tarball > then send in patches it benifits everyone. you mean me? not we. right? look, i had it running by patching the wrong wc-par. then i created some slideshows of my holiday pictures, burnt it to a DVD and sent it off to my 5-year-old-the-cutest-ever-cousin. there is no "most of the things". there is 1. when i fixed the wc-par, i sent an email to the port maintainer about the f= ix. now you want me to upgrade to a version which is apperently worse than mine ( i have no probs creating slideshow, i needed to add a symlink cause i tested your scenario ). i welcome your good intentions. we might send the port-maintainer an email stating that using 1.7.2_1 + wc-par fix + seq to job symlink works better than _3. regards, usleep