From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Aug 24 2:32:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from kawoserv.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (kawoserv.kawo2.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.180.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DFE37B408; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 02:32:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alex@big.endian.de) Received: from zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.181.28]) by kawoserv.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA21083; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:32:43 +0200 Received: by zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E61DD14B30; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:32:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:32:42 +0200 From: Alexander Langer To: "David O'Brien" Cc: Nate Williams , arch@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports.conf Message-ID: <20010824113242.B1095@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> Mail-Followup-To: Alexander Langer , David O'Brien , Nate Williams , arch@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010823210729.A95484@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> <20010823135941.B4003@dragon.nuxi.com> <15237.37767.274325.945753@nomad.yogotech.com> <20010823192558.A6265@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010823192558.A6265@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 07:25:58PM -0700 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 28 CA 4C 46 5B D3 A8 A8 E3 BA F3 4E 60 7D 7F X-PGP-at: finger alex@big.endian.de X-Verwirrung: Dieser Header dient der allgemeinen Verwirrung. Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thus spake David O'Brien (obrien@FreeBSD.ORG): > > Would something like /etc/ports.conf be acceptable? That way it can be > > modified separately from the configuration for the main /usr/src tree, > Yes. Not because it separates things from knobs for /usr/src, but > because it separates things logically. So, are you ok with: - share/mk/sys.mk only sucking in /defaults/make.conf and /etc/make.conf - bsd.port.mk sucking in $PORTSDIR/Mk/ports.conf and then overwriteable in /etc/ports.conf? (Don't bother about the location in the ports/ tree, which can change). I think this is the general agreement, isn't it? Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message