From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 8 17:46:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7198216A4CE for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:46:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE2743D5C for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:46:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) id j18HkrKe085042; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:46:53 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:46:53 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Chris Hodgins Message-ID: <20050208174653.GB82752@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20050208115928.GE8619@alzatex.com> <20050208162429.GA82752@dan.emsphone.com> <4208F605.9060402@cis.strath.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4208F605.9060402@cis.strath.ac.uk> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: "Loren M. Lang" cc: FreeBSD Mailing list Subject: Re: ktrace as a replacement for strace X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:46:59 -0000 In the last episode (Feb 08), Chris Hodgins said: > Is truss still being fixed to work without procfs or is ktrace a > better replacement? There hasn't been any work on ptrace-ing truss in almost two years. It works fine with procfs though. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com