From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 25 18:13:16 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E1916A420;
	Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:13:16 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [204.156.12.53])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B47C43D69;
	Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:13:14 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50])
	by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5660B46BB6;
	Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:13:13 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:13:13 +0100 (BST)
From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org
To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <430E09F8.8090001@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20050825191230.C16967@fledge.watson.org>
References: <430DF217.2020908@drexel.edu>
	<20050825173440.O16967@fledge.watson.org>
	<430E09F8.8090001@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: "Justin R. Smith" <jsmith@drexel.edu>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Hyperthreading degrades performance?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:13:16 -0000


On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Andre Oppermann wrote:

> Don't forget better PIV revisions with larger instruction decoder 
> caches, better cache prefetching and branch prediction.  I doubt much of 
> the improvement is due to our SMP changes.  A real test to find out 
> whether it's our work or Intels would be to benchmark an old (pre 
> Nacona) PIV running 5.3R and 7.0-current vs. a new one doing the same.

Well, given that my test box for this hasn't changed in three years, I 
think I can safely argue it's not the hardware :-).

Robert N M Watson