From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 16 10:36:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A0416A4B3; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from v6.hitachi.co.jp (galilei.v6.hitachi.co.jp [133.145.167.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A69143FDF; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:36:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp) Received: from prince.don.to ([192.168.242.69]) by v6.hitachi.co.jp (8.12.9p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9GHcBmx008984; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 02:38:12 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prince.don.to (8.12.10/3.7W) with ESMTP id h9GHaPMJ048883; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:36:25 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:36:24 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <20031016.183624.28993813.sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp> To: kris@obsecurity.org From: Munechika Sumikawa In-Reply-To: <20031016170632.GA71519@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <200310160958.h9G9wL0c069842@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031016170632.GA71519@rot13.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: xcite1.48> Mew version 4.0.58 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org cc: sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp cc: sumikawa@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/xwipower Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:36:34 -0000 > > Do not build this port on alpha and sparc64 since APM is not supported > > on them. > > I think this should be an inclusive list (i.e. ONLY_FOR_ARCHES). APM > is not likely to be supported on any further platforms FreeBSD will > ever run on (e.g. powerpc), so otherwise this list will need to be > updated each time we support a new architecture. Ah, you're right. I thought it was supported on other PC/AT based architectures such as amd64 and ia64. I will fix them. -- Sumikawa