From owner-freebsd-security Wed Sep 15 19:19:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77B514A26 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 19:19:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 415731C24; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 21:23:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364D73817; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 21:23:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 21:23:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Brett Glass Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BPF on in 3.3-RC GENERIC kernel In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19990915164546.048d0100@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Brett Glass wrote: > Was doing some testing on the latest release candidate of FreeBSD 3.3, and > noted that the Berkeley Packet Filter was enabled in the GENERIC kernel. Is > this a good idea? A better question is: Is it a good idea to ask questions that have been hashed over in the (publically archived) mailing lists (including the one you are posting on)? -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message