From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun  4 04:27:48 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E8DF216A4CE; Fri,  4 Jun 2004 04:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1FE6D43D1D; Fri,  4 Jun 2004 04:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from glebius@cell.sick.ru)
Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cell.sick.ru (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i54BRZvw098375
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:27:36 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from glebius@cell.sick.ru)
Received: (from glebius@localhost)
	by cell.sick.ru (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id i54BRYWF098374;
	Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:27:34 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:27:33 +0400
From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@cell.sick.ru>
To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
Message-ID: <20040604112733.GC98227@cell.sick.ru>
References: <20040531215101.GA60299@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<20040602094940.GA80394@cell.sick.ru> <200406021056.53005.sam@errno.com>
	<20040603094626.GA89838@cell.sick.ru> <20040603151911.GB12727@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040603151911.GB12727@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
cc: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@freebsd.org>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [HEADS-UP] mbuma is in the tree
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 11:27:49 -0000

On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 08:19:11AM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
B> > On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:56:52AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
B> > S> allocated using this mechanism.  I did it once for vlan tags but botched it 
B> > S> (didn't handle module references properly) so backed it. But there's no 
B> > S> reason someone cannot redo it or convert other heavily used fixed size tags 
B> > S> to use a zone.
B> > 
B> > Have you saved your efforts? May I look at them?
B> 
B> They are in the CVS history of sys/net/if_vlan.c.

I see now, thanks.

Question to Sam: have you performed any tests? Is this definitely
true, that UMAllocing in special zone is faster than general malloc()?

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE