From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 17:25:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D074116A4CE; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:25:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4D743D2F; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:25:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.2.73] (cpe.125.wat.v126.packetworks.net [64.235.97.125] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6SHVw0P015468; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:31:58 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <4107E0F6.8060902@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:23:02 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040702 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Watson References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: Alfred Perlstein cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Garrett Wollman Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys _task.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:25:09 -0000 Robert Watson wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > >>< said: >> >> >>>* Maxime Henrion [040728 02:19] wrote: >>> >>>>Or have a struct ifnet for kernel and a struct xifnet for userland, as we >>>>do in other places. >> >>>That sounds more correct (xifnet). >> >>No. Everything that would legitimately be available in an xifnet >>structure is already made available through other interfaces. The only >>reason programs might need to look at a struct ifnet is because they're >>mucking about in kernel memory, in which case they need the real one and >>not a "sanitized" version. (This is why I moved struct ifnet to >> in the first place.) > > > Some applications and libraries declare their known violation of layering > boundaries in the system by #define _KERNEL. Others structures have > special #define's, such as COMPAT_43, _WANT_UCRED, etc. I'd be happy with > either #define _KERNEL or #if defined(_KERNEL) || _WANT_IFNET. > > Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects > robert@fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research > > I'd be quite happy with #ifndef _KERNEL #error "No user-servicable parts inside" or similar as is in /sys/sys/timetc.h. Either way, pollution bad, fluffy bunnies good. Scott