From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 16:47:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FEC1065678 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:47:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlott@averesystems.com) Received: from zimbra.averesystems.com (75-149-8-245-Pennsylvania.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [75.149.8.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 896708FC17 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.averesystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F3F8BC009; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:49:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at averesystems.com Received: from zimbra.averesystems.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.averesystems.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TMZbZXTuov7s; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:49:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jlott-mac.arriad.com (fw.arriad.com [10.0.0.16]) by zimbra.averesystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0C508BC008; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:49:44 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Jeremiah Lott In-Reply-To: <1931983408.909766.1311369086133.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:46:56 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1931983408.909766.1311369086133.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> To: Rick Macklem X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LOR with nfsclient "sillyrename" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:47:01 -0000 On Jul 22, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: > Please try the attached patch (which is also at): > http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/oldsilly.patch > http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/newsilly.patch > (for the old and new clients in -current, respectively) >=20 > - I think oldsilly.patch should apply to the 7.n kernel > sources, although you might have to do the edit by hand? It applied with minimal futzing. > Please let me know how testing goes with it, rick Unfortunately we've never reproduced the original problem in the lab. = Only in the field under heavy stress. I did build a kernel with the = patch and run it under some of our tests, it seems to work correctly. = We'll continue to test it, but I wanted to give you an update. Thanks a = lot for your help. Jeremiah Lott Avere Systems