From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Jun 24 17:42:29 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA17239
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 17:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA17231
          for <FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 17:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA22411; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 17:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
cc: FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: tcl 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 25 Jun 1997 01:30:10 +0200."
             <19970625013010.RD29343@uriah.heep.sax.de> 
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 17:42:42 -0700
Message-ID: <22389.867199362@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> The point for Tcl was rather that it could be used in things like the
> new sysinstall (and i think Jordan's serious about this now).  Anyway,
> the existing version in /usr/src could/should probably be upgraded
> before actually going into use anyway.

I agree.

					Jordan