From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 6 08:41:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6022016A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 08:41:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from wolfram.com (wri-dns0.wolfram.com [140.177.205.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC41943FF7 for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 08:41:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hemi@just.puresimplicity.net) Received: from just.puresimplicity.net ([140.177.207.10]) by wolfram.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id hA6GfOM07107; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:41:29 -0600 Received: (from hemi@localhost) by just.puresimplicity.net (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/Submit) id hA6GfNqQ071154; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:41:23 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from hemi) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:41:23 -0600 From: Josh Tolbert To: rob copsey Message-ID: <20031106164123.GA71078@just.puresimplicity.net> References: <200311051722.hA5HMlMI037687@mail0.mx.voyager.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200311051722.hA5HMlMI037687@mail0.mx.voyager.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: *56 - versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Alpha List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 16:41:40 -0000 On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:22:47PM -0500, rob copsey wrote: > Hello, > I've recently come across a *56 processor that starts with pc > rather than ev. Can I use this in my Miata MX5? Is this a version > of the architecture with cache that more closly resembles that of > an x86 for use with windoze? > please help > -RC > -- Hi Rob, I haven't seen any responses yet, so I'm going to take a stab at it. The answer is "no, PC56 CPUs won't work in a PWS." The PC56 CPUs were touted as "inexpensive Alphas" and were only used in one motherboard (that I know of), the PC164SX. They were cheaper than EV56 CPUs, but didn't perform as well. I'm pulling all of this from memory, so feel free to call me nasty names if I'm wrong. :) Thanks, Josh