From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 19:42:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24A116A4CE for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 19:42:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5953843D31 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 19:42:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iB3Jg1e2016209; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:42:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@ns1.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iB3Jg1Oj016208; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:42:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:42:01 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20041203194201.GB16093@ns1.xcllnt.net> References: <200412030813.iB38DA12044595@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041203.110520.54185564.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041203.110520.54185564.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/pci pci.c X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 19:42:10 -0000 On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:05:20AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <200412030813.iB38DA12044595@repoman.freebsd.org> > Nate Lawson writes: > : njl 2004-12-03 08:13:09 UTC > : > : FreeBSD src repository > : > : Modified files: > : sys/dev/pci pci.c > : Log: > : Non-x86 platforms cannot use the ACPI includes. This should be fixed but > : for now, only include the headers for i386, amd64, or ia64. > : > : Pointed out by: grehan > > We likely should have a sys/$MACHINE_ARCH/include/_config.h that has a > bunch of #defines that we can test instead of specific architecture > lists, don't you think? A doesn't give me warm fuzzies. Maybe we can rename to and give it some additional use (for this particular case of course). -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net