From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 29 17:11:28 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A4816A4CF
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:11:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6864E43D5D
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:11:28 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru)
Received: from [83.237.61.15] (port=1372 helo=[172.17.0.69])
	by mx2.mail.ru with esmtp 
	id 1CjhLj-000LIV-00; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 20:11:03 +0300
Message-ID: <41D2E50E.2020704@mail.ru>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 20:10:38 +0300
From: "Andrew P." <infofarmer@mail.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark <mark@darklogik.org>
References: <20041229041306.A21646@logik.ath.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20041229041306.A21646@logik.ath.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: Not detected
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Cheap NAS using FreeBSD - practical considerations?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:11:29 -0000

Mark wrote:
>>That's something :-) I only built a separate FreeBSD file-server because
>>I have to run Windows on my PC and I can't trust M$ software with 700Gb+
>>of data. However, some people store many terabytes with Windows Storage
>>Server - and look what happened in UK a few weeks ago :-) 
> 
> What happened a few weeks ago?
> 

http://www.google.com/search?q=uk+government+windows+upgrade+down
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/windows/0,39020396,39175160,00.htm