From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 26 14:10:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC20916A4BF for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 14:10:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccmmhc02.asp.att.net (sccmmhc02.asp.att.net [204.127.203.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2873243FEC for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 14:10:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from math.missouri.edu (12-216-240-169.client.mchsi.com[12.216.240.169]) by sccmmhc02.asp.att.net (sccmmhc02) with SMTP id <20030826211010mm200e90dre>; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 21:10:11 +0000 Message-ID: <3F4BCCB2.4090009@math.missouri.edu> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:10:10 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030825 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Hartland References: <001a01c36bff$cff9e840$a700000a@TYBOX> <00e501c36c11$9352d930$b3db87d4@vader> In-Reply-To: <00e501c36c11$9352d930$b3db87d4@vader> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port bonding on nc3122 ( dual fxp ) NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 21:10:15 -0000 Steven Hartland wrote: > Does anyone know if this is possible. I've done some googling > around and cant find anything. Using 5.1-RELEASE is just > detecting them as fxp0 and fxp1 > Assuming that I understand what you are asking, I believe that in FreeBSD they call it netgraph - "man ng_one2many" should give you the info you need. I had a friend who tried it out, and it seems to be completely compatible with the port bonding that Linux provides. (He also felt that the documentation for FreeBSD netgraph was better than the documentation that came with Linux port bonding, in particular the FreeBSD docs were better at explaining how it worked.) -- Stephen Montgomery-Smith stephen@math.missouri.edu http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen