From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 11:59:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A4416A4CF for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:59:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailbox.univie.ac.at (mail.univie.ac.at [131.130.1.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF7A43D1F for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:59:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from l.ertl@univie.ac.at) Received: from wireless (adslle.cc.univie.ac.at [131.130.102.11]) by mailbox.univie.ac.at (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB9JxnZq138398 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 20:59:51 +0100 Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 20:59:50 +0100 (CET) From: Lukas Ertl To: doc@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031209205743.K602@korben.in.tern> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-DCC-ZID-Univie-Metrics: mailbox 4246; Body=0 Fuz1=0 Fuz2=0 Subject: arch/developer handbook: for 4.x oder 5.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 19:59:56 -0000 Hi, I just came around some sample code in the arch handbook that's not correct for 5.x and I wondered if I should send in a patch or are arch/developer handbooks considered to reflect 4.x behaviour? regards, le -- Lukas Ertl eMail: l.ertl@univie.ac.at UNIX Systemadministrator Tel.: (+43 1) 4277-14073 Vienna University Computer Center Fax.: (+43 1) 4277-9140 University of Vienna http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/