From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Jan 29 11:13:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA15903 for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 11:13:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from vex.net (root@shell.vex.net [207.107.242.162]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA15880; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 11:13:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from vex.net(really [207.107.242.162]) by vex.net via sendmail with smtp id for ; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 14:12:59 -0500 (EST) (Smail-3.2.0.90 1996-Dec-4 #4 built 1997-Jan-8) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 14:12:59 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Tao To: phk@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org, bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vx0 receives any and all packets ??? In-Reply-To: <9404.854376818@critter.dk.tfs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 27 Jan 1997, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > vx0 <3COM 3C900 Etherlink XL PCI> rev 0 int a irq 9 on pci0:9 > utp/aui/bnc[*bnc*] address 00:60:97:06:ef:c5 vx0 <3COM 3C900 Etherlink XL PCI> rev 0 int a irq 9 on pci0:10:0 utp[*utp*]: disable 'auto select' with DOS util! address 00:a0:24:dd:ca:a3 vx0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 10.35.5.203 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 10.255.255.255 ether 00:a0:24:dd:ca:a3 > and "tcpdump -p" as well as "netstat -s" seems to indicate that > any and all packet on my ethernet gets forwarded to my IP stack :-( I think I'm seeing this here as well. On what should otherwise be a completely network-quiet workstation, I'm seeing this with `netstat 1': input (Total) output packets errs bytes packets errs bytes colls 18 0 2713 0 0 0 0 7 0 1684 0 0 0 0 14 0 841 0 0 0 0 14 0 852 0 0 0 0 15 0 1166 0 0 0 0 11 0 1405 0 0 0 0 24 0 1774 0 0 0 0 32 0 3164 0 0 0 0 47 0 11969 0 0 0 0 49 0 19136 0 0 0 0 59 0 22704 0 0 0 0 58 0 21506 0 0 0 0 63 0 25942 0 0 0 0 45 0 19668 0 0 0 0 45 0 19237 0 0 0 0 40 0 18072 0 0 0 0 21 0 1534 0 0 0 0 22 0 1606 0 0 0 0 15 0 1127 0 0 0 0 27 0 2551 0 0 0 0 15 0 1209 0 0 0 0 I just got this machine in yesterday, and it's the first time I've used the EtherLink XL 3C900-TPO controller. This is a "Rev A' card, according to the traces on the board. I'll try your patch on 3.0-970124 and see what happens. -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob@risc.org) "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"