From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 13 12:19:26 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A09CCF59
 for <freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 12:19:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.feld.me (mail.feld.me [66.170.3.6])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mail.feld.me", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D3EB201C
 for <freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 12:19:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.feld.me (mail.feld.me [66.170.3.6]);
 by mail.feld.me (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id eeaff6af;
 for <freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 07:19:22 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from feld@feld.me by mail.feld.me (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with
 esmtpa id 1399983561-4153-4150/5/4; Tue, 13 May 2014 12:19:21 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 07:19:20 -0500
From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: new jail framework with vnet, zfs and jail.conf support
In-Reply-To: <53720C0F.9010707@a1poweruser.com>
References: <640993be45d72e4dac19181ae6644d27@dachev.info>
 <53720C0F.9010707@a1poweruser.com>
Message-Id: <2f171efc50e58d003930369af9e0e544@mail.feld.me>
X-Sender: feld@FreeBSD.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.5
Sender: feld@feld.me
X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" <freebsd-jail.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-jail>,
 <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail>,
 <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 12:19:26 -0000

On 2014-05-13 07:11, fbsd8@a1poweruser.com wrote:
> 
> I think you have made some poor basic design choices.
> 

Let him scratch his itch. Maybe it solves a problem you haven't 
encountered yet?

> 1. Requiring python as a dependent. Thats a lot of overhead just for a
> script. Not a show stopper, but a csh script would have been better.
> 

csh is a horrible scripting language. I think you mean POSIX sh. But 
either way, Python is slowly becoming the language of choice for 
utilities...