From owner-freebsd-isp Sat May 26 8:49:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from imo-d01.mx.aol.com (imo-d01.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6B237B423 for ; Sat, 26 May 2001 08:49:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Bsdguru@aol.com) Received: from Bsdguru@aol.com by imo-d01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.22.) id n.9a.14dd3669 (16785); Sat, 26 May 2001 11:47:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Bsdguru@aol.com Message-ID: <9a.14dd3669.28412a1f@aol.com> Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 11:47:43 EDT Subject: Re: Freeside To: bv@wjv.com Cc: isp@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 139 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In a message dated 05/25/2001 10:14:42 PM Eastern Daylight Time, bill@wjv.com writes: > I can be reading mail while my system is getting mail. If you > are a BSDguru why aren't you using BSD so you don't have to do > things like that. Because as a desktop solution BSD is inferior. You use the best tool available for the job. If you think that FreeBSD is always the best tool, you are not only not a good engineer but you are a fool.