From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 12:32:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3ED16A400; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9230313C491; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id D7AAE365901; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:32:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from secure.esiee.fr (secure.esiee.fr [147.215.1.19]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C52F3658B2; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:32:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [147.215.1.21] (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bonnetf) by secure.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C72F3991B; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:23:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45F0025F.7090803@esiee.fr> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:32:31 +0100 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikos Vassiliadis References: <45EFFB97.30602@esiee.fr> <200703081422.05419.nvass@teledomenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <200703081422.05419.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Two ethernet one IP load balancing ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:32:37 -0000 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > > Why do you think that the network is the bottleneck > in your setup? Do you have a system that can process > - in some way - 1Gb of email per second? That is not ONLY smtp traffic we extensively use IMAP and there are currently 400/500 IMAP processes on the machine , this protocol is a pretty bandwidth cruncher the machine support also POP3 + WEBMAIL traffic so ... the more it will have bandwidth, better will be the email service given to my users.