From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 26 21:36:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157A916A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 21:36:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from minnie.everett.org (minnie.everett.org [66.220.13.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028E843D58 for ; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 21:36:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from harlan@minnie.everett.org) Received: from minnie.everett.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.everett.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1EB5483D; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 13:36:12 -0800 (PST) To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 26 Dec 2004 07:01:38 PST." <20041226150137.GB2566@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 13:36:12 -0800 From: Harlan Stenn Message-Id: <20041226213612.DB1EB5483D@minnie.everett.org> cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: harlan@everett.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -P and local changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 21:36:13 -0000 Yes, but that means I have to remember to build and package the ports first, before I do anything else, and that implies I have to handle any changed prerequisite packages as well. If a way can be found to say "Do not fetch these packages" then this will become a much easier process. H -- >> Is there a way to tell portupgrade that it should not *fetch* prebuilt ports >> for these two packages? If the packages are already there I'm fine having >> them installed (as it means they were built using the Makefile.local values >> and wrapped as a package from the -p flag). >Doesn't it use packages if they're present in the ${PACKAGES} >directory (/usr/ports/packages by default)?