From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Sep 27 16:47:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C5D37B40A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 16:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8RNlKu51098; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:47:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8RNlJ777156; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:47:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200109272347.f8RNlJ777156@harmony.village.org> To: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: Proposed change: d_thread_t for driver portability between 4.x and 5.x Cc: arch@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:39:59 PDT." References: Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:47:19 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Julian Elischer writes: : I think that it should have a Comment stating that it is a compatibility : thing and that drivers for just -current should just use struct thread : directly. Excellent idea. : Certainly any function that DOES look under the covers should be expressly : forbidden from using d_thread_t. Yes. I'll note that as well. Thanks for the feedback. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message