From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 9 16:43:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A612E16A4EB; Mon, 9 May 2005 16:43:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172A843D62; Mon, 9 May 2005 16:43:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j49GgYdb053165; Mon, 9 May 2005 10:42:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 10:42:34 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20050509.104234.71141880.imp@bsdimp.com> To: ume@freebsd.org From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: References: <200505041529.36826.peter@wemm.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: standards@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org cc: peter@wemm.org cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFR] correct type of addrinfo.ai_addrlen and netent.n_net X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 16:43:54 -0000 > Are you suggest when to remove padding? Since the major of libc was > bumped already in 6-CURRENT, it may better to wait 7-CURRENT. We've generally not worried compatibility in the 'rough and tumble' world of FreeBSD current. So unless there's a problem in the upgrade path, I think that we safely omit them. Warner