From owner-freebsd-security Wed Sep 15 19:29:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208EE153D9 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 19:29:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA75362; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 20:29:21 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id UAA17804; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 20:28:44 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199909160228.UAA17804@harmony.village.org> To: "Harry M. Leitzell" Subject: Re: BPF on in 3.3-RC GENERIC kernel Cc: Brett Glass , security@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 Sep 1999 18:59:45 EDT." References: Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 20:28:44 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message "Harry M. Leitzell" writes: : Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't the list have a huge : arguement over this a while back and the decision was to leave it in for : some reasons that someone dreamed up? Anyone who didn't see the issue : brought up, might want to check the list logs (Wherever they might be) for : 3.2 or another release. Short answer: The convenience of DHCP overrode whatever perceived benefits from leaving it out got you. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message