From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 6 13:12:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4FE16A408 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:12:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDE713C480 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:12:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2007 09:12:15 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.3-GA) with ESMTP id NDI07612; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 09:12:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 65-78-26-179.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([65.78.26.179]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2007 10:11:53 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17942.18219.132186.157247@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 09:12:11 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4615ECC6.3060801@u.washington.edu> References: <20070406002614.75448.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <4615ECC6.3060801@u.washington.edu> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: backup solution for home FreeBSD server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 13:12:16 -0000 Garrett Cooper writes: > Have you also considered tape backup as well as standard disks? > Tapes are a bit more expensive, but overall a more static backup > / archiving solution than disks. Besides, they're cheaper in the > long run from what remember. The problem is: tapes are slow; backing up 30 gbytes to a DLT-III used to take 3-4 hours. Or rather the cost of a tape system seems to increase as the square of the transfer speed; a (new) LTO-2 drive will cost $1000+$35/tape. Robert Huff