From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 14:23:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 2DC9116A46E; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF44B16A469; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:23:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B85E13C458; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:23:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472C28AFD9; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:05:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:05:17 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: YDl15dGfkG1t7pvCQMS8/73u/SJCkIMsHm5mBxUDWHQV 1200665117 Received: from empiric.lon.incunabulum.net (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8398EB57; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:05:16 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4790B21B.3000102@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:05:15 +0000 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070928) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warner Losh References: <200801180525.m0I5PKss045795@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200801180525.m0I5PKss045795@repoman.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 133522 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:23:03 -0000 Warner Losh wrote: > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=133522 > > Change 133522 by imp@imp_paco-paco on 2008/01/18 05:25:09 > > Prefer ${SHELL} to sh, since I like it. Sadly, I got complaints > when I proposed it for -current. > The source of the objection might be that GNU make is known to prefer bash -- and I've torn my hair out on more than one occasion because of this behaviour. However, buildenv is a target which explicitly forks an interactive shell, so the use of SHELL seems reasonable in this instance. cheers BMS