From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 12 11:58:40 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 696FF16A4CE; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:58:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7BF9143D45; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:58:38 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua)
Received: from localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2])
	by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iACBwbum016149;
	Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:58:37 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua)
Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10])
 by localhost (rocky.ipnet [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
 id 48208-18; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:58:33 +0200 (EET)
Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213])
	by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iACBwPYG016143
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:58:25 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua)
Received: (from ru@localhost)
	by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) id iACBwPJd085866;
	Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:58:25 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from ru)
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:58:24 +0200
From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Message-ID: <20041112115824.GA85834@ip.net.ua>
References: <20041112111732.GH41844@ip.net.ua>
	<96526.1100258610@critter.freebsd.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <96526.1100258610@critter.freebsd.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ip.net.ua
cc: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [TEST] make -j patch [take 2]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:58:40 -0000


--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 12:23:30PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20041112111732.GH41844@ip.net.ua>, Ruslan Ermilov writes:
> >
> >On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:24:12AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> >> It would actually give me _more_ control over make's behaviour. I coul=
d,
> >=20
> >> for example, build the tool with -j4, but run the tool with -j2. Suppo=
se
> >=20
> >> that is a long running regression test that I don't want to occupy my=
=20
> >> 4 processor machine, but I want the tool for the test to build fast.
> >>=20
> >Here's the patch that changes the -j behavior the way I want it:
>=20
> I think that patch is a bad idea.
>=20
Care to explain?


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBlKVgqRfpzJluFF4RAkmFAJ41ckHUmu12Tefr51f/QfMCz6vX9ACfXYz8
NRcf3oxPP9edTzj+QNzN3kg=
=CiLu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--