From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 17:07:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC59B16A400 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 17:07:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AE513C469 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 17:07:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 5400 invoked from network); 18 May 2007 17:07:16 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 18 May 2007 17:07:16 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 6E5382843A; Fri, 18 May 2007 13:07:15 -0400 (EDT) To: Duane Hill References: <20070516182846.C34584@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> <464BCE1A.4020400@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20070517102831.O61920@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> <20070518141045.490c80be@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20070518132807.Q17258@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:07:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070518132807.Q17258@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> (Duane Hill's message of "Fri\, 18 May 2007 13\:31\:52 +0000 \(UTC\)") Message-ID: <443b1uukl8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64 FreeBSD Release 5.5 -> 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 17:07:17 -0000 Duane Hill writes: > What about: > > portupgrade -afR > > Wouldn't that force everything including ports that depend on the one > being reinstalled? I can't parse your question, but I think you are confusing the 'R' option with the 'r' option. You should also note that both options are redundant if "-a" is also specified.