From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 22 19:25:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BE710657A6 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:25:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35708FC21 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:25:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13511 invoked by uid 399); 22 Aug 2010 19:25:05 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 22 Aug 2010 19:25:05 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4C717990.6020601@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:25:04 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100807 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <26CBB559-FA72-4688-92E9-ED9CEA151B2C@FreeBSD.org> <20100821.191255.1023414010414033264.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20100821.191255.1023414010414033264.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, rpaulo@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, bz@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, anchie@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r211501 - in head/sys: modules modules/send netinet netinet6 sys X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:25:07 -0000 On 08/21/2010 18:12, M. Warner Losh wrote: > Do we really need to have a bunch of threads about why people should > do the things they have promised to do? Since this is basically a useless/snarky question, here are some useless/snarky responses. Feel free to pick your favorite. Apparently we do, since there's still no man page for the new feature. I don't know Warner, what do you think? How many threads would you prefer on this topic? I guess you're right, we don't really need man pages after all. Thanks for setting me straight. Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso