From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 23 08:57:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F849106564A for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:57:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from auryn@zirakzigil.org) Received: from mail.giulioferro.it (mail.giulioferro.it [85.18.102.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D32D8FC1E for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:57:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from auryn@zirakzigil.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.giulioferro.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C1A33C37; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:59:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at giulioferro.it Received: from mail.giulioferro.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aurynwork1sv1.giulioferro.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r006ctnXG2Ie; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:59:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.10.81] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: gferro@giulioferro.it) by mail.giulioferro.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0F333C35; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:59:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <48D8AF8E.6080507@zirakzigil.org> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:57:50 +0200 From: Giulio Ferro User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eygene Ryabinkin , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <48D8A232.600@zirakzigil.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: lost routes X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:57:58 -0000 Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Giulio, good day. > > Good day to you. > Was the problem described in some PR? > I don't know, really. I heard about it in the past (some years ago) from another guy, and it has happened to me for at least 2-3 years. This is just the first time I've decided to report it (my bad)... > Can it be so that the interface goes down and then it is resurrected by > the sequence that is more-or-less identical to /etc/rc.d/netif restart? > This can lead to the route loss. Do you have some kernel messages that > are related to the interface on which routes are lost? > Nope. There are no messages in the logs, and no interface has been touched. Anyway, since there are a lot of routes and only one gets deleted I don't think it depends on interface changing (it would delete them all, wouldn't it?) Interestingly enough, one of the routes that is erased has the same gateway as several others which aren't deleted. Hope it rings some bell... Bye.