From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 2 12:40:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34DD1759 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 12:40:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2393FF11 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 12:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r12Ce1M3067749 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 12:40:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r12Ce1Ws067748; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 12:40:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 12:40:01 GMT Message-Id: <201302021240.r12Ce1Ws067748@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "O. Hartmann" Subject: Re: ports/175532: x11/xdm: /bin/cp -n /usr/local/share/examples/xdm/GiveConsole /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/GiveConsole *** [post-install] Error code 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: "O. Hartmann" List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:40:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/175532; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "O. Hartmann" To: Niclas Zeising Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/175532: x11/xdm: /bin/cp -n /usr/local/share/examples/xdm/GiveConsole /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/GiveConsole *** [post-install] Error code 1 Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 13:33:38 +0100 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8FB7CDC80745FF72FE3CA7D7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 02/02/13 13:16, schrieb Niclas Zeising: > On 02/02/13 13:04, O. Hartmann wrote: >> Am 02/02/13 11:21, schrieb Niclas Zeising: >>> On 02/02/13 11:15, O. Hartmann wrote: >>>> Am 02/02/13 10:34, schrieb Niclas Zeising: >>>>> Hi! >>>>> Apparently something in the base system has changed, which affects >>>>> rebuild of this port when it is already installed. Since this chan= ge to >>>>> the base system isn't very old, and most ports testing are done on = clean >>>>> systems, using tinderbox or poudriere or similar software, this has= gone >>>>> through the cracks. For now, I suggest you remove xdm before >>>>> reinstalling it, since all files should be removed in the >>>>> deinstallation. If xdm leaves files behind, then that is a separat= e >>>>> issue. however that would show up on a tinderbox run, and I can bu= ild >>>>> xdm fine in my tinderbox. >>>>> Regards! >>>>> >>>> >>>> Have you used NEW_XORG=3DYES in make.conf? I use those bits to build= the >>>> most recent stuff and I realized this causes problems since several= >>>> changes a couple of days ago. >>>> >>>> Oliver >>>> >>> >>> Yes. What other problems are you referring to? x11/xdm is the same >>> version regardless of WITH_NEW_XORG. >>> Regards! >>> >> >> Those problems are related to other ports, databases/akonadi or >> deskutils/kdepimlibs4 which refuse to compile not finding qmake (which= >> is installed as qmake-qt4). >> >> From time to time I realized running CURRENT, it is wise to recompile >> ports. So I did with xorg and xdm since they had been compiled in the >> CLANG 3.1 era and now we are with CLANG 3.2 and with libc++. >> >> When I performed a "portmaster -w -r xorg xdm", I found myself lost wi= th >> the reported error and with a deleted pkg database entry for xdm. >> x11/xdm wasn't even reported installed then - but the binaries of the >> new build were obviously there. >> >> It is not the first time that portmaster deletes a port and at the ver= y >> end it fails and refuses updating the database, like it happened with >> x11/xdm. >=20 > Without knowing any details, that sounds partly like a problem with > portmaster... As I said, I can't reproduce the xdm issue locally, > although I do not use portmaster, and most of my builds are done with a= > tinderbox of some sort. > Regards! >=20 In my case, I can reproduce the fail on ALL boxes equipted with a X11/xorg and running 10.0-CURRENT installation, but NOT on 9.1-STABLE. I wouldn't doubt having problems, since I share the same principle of configurations and installations around the machine - same needs on the boxes. Applying Mark's patch solves the problem for me on the boxes in question.= Oliver --------------enig8FB7CDC80745FF72FE3CA7D7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRDQejAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8GA4H/3J3q/S3a18egdaguD/iwtdo 9Wm5sAN/8a0Aff9MLz5G9unuT9lEuIqeX7a0tpQlJf9VVVWgtpRG4828VJ0HLeXR DzmNK90RvBV58hv+9RcfOARsqsLuimaXVAodKe1LpTS+2pbonYMsK5CsKiSb5tfh 6qkWg9+dXgUL2XfFTiDCWz0+VTXN0wegV+sWH0CqZ1JasNw2b/cTBoQTmDfxsKdF lYEFlYjHX5Z0rSxhp6yBN3XC5anth3L0fDQg0bM0YX5N9GaFiDs4TVKuddyotpGP +qvkgjBVbfMkxNuGLGhhXHlQA16uMGLaDXSmJuH0SOTQAp1u4XbuJKUXzDTfL24= =uadR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8FB7CDC80745FF72FE3CA7D7--